Posts: Governance & Policy Advocacy
KRC CONFLICT MAPPING REPORT Northern Uganda
This study was commissioned by KRC Uganda working in consortia with the Centre for Economic Social Cultural Rights in Africa (CESCRA) and Women and Rural Development Network (WORUDET) with funding from The European Union. The purpose was to understand the conflict dynamics pertaining the refugee settlements of Palabek, Bidi Bidi and Rhino where they intended to conduct peaceful coexistence activities, with a view to realigning the project to suit the conflict resolution and peace building needsof the target groups. The objectives of the analysis included assessing the nature of conflicts, mitigation and resolution measures to address the conflicts, the existing conflict management infrastructure, the drivers to the conflict, interventions gaps and practical recommendations to address the conflict contexts in the respective settlements. This was premised on the hope that a successful analysis on the basis ofthe above objectives would guide an effective design and implementation of relevant peacebuilding and conflict management interventions. The analysis findings are discussed in form of the existing forms of conflicts in the settlements, the drivers, key actors, causes, and the indicators, interventions to address the conflicts, existing gaps conclusions, and recommendations respectively. These components of the analysis were meant to give a clear outlook of the current conflict context, in a way that was simplified enough for humanitarian organizations and other stakeholders to easily understand the issues at hand, the key actors, potential challenges, and practical approaches that could be adopted to effectively address the conflict context. The different forms of conflicts consisted of Resource based conflicts, mainly concerning access to land, building materials and fuel, Identity conflicts that are mainly ethnic driven, Generational conflicts involving the youth and their adult counterparts, Structural conflicts, and Relationship conflicts. The other forms of conflicts which were mainly influenced by the external actors were still imbedded in ethnicity or resource scarcity among others, as their entry points. The drivers that enable these conflicts to thrive include: ethnic diversity, different forms of livelihood, scarcity of services and limited infrastructure, structural deficiencies, differences in legal regimes the nature of socialization and longtime traumatizing experiences. The categories of key actors in the conflicts cut across the social sphere. In relationships and gender based conflicts, there different actors such as married couples, individual men and women, young men from the different ethnic groups. In resource based conflicts there are Landlords, government, refugee tenants, Herdsmen/cattle keepers and crop farmers, and host community members. In identity conflicts, ethnic groups of the Dinka, Nuer, Acholi and the Murle were reported to clash. In structural conflicts, organizational staff, Police, community members, Local leaders and leaders from the central government were the reported actors. In generational conflicts, Children and parents, youth employees and their adult employers, then Child-rights organizations. The common causes of the conflict include: Crop encroachment and or destruction by animals violation of water fetching queues, selective treatment during delivery of services, unsolicited access for fetching of firewood, timber, grass from other people’s land, restriction of children from exploration of available opportunities, unclear land boundaries, water shortage and regulated time for opening taps, manipulation and breach of informal land hire agreements, disrespect for cultural differences, restrictedaccess to information or lack of transparency among the humanitarian organizations, knowledge gaps concerning the Ugandan laws, marginalization of women in decision making, stereotyping, theft and language barrier among others. The conflict indicators manifested differently at different stages of the conflict. At the latent stage, cold relations among people, formation of particular groups, change of routes or even a service facility such as a health centre. At the escalation stage, quarrels over issues, outbursts in open places, open accusations, reporting issues to police, family and or group meetings, and demonstrations were reported. At the climax or burn out stage, open fights, house burning, suicide, home desertion by the affected parties, waylaying people, and murders among others. At the de-escalation stage, there were calls for dialogue, private conversations, and reappearance in the homesteads, making reference to organizations, seeking help from individuals, extending apologies and seeking forgiveness among others. Some of the gaps identified include: understanding of the conflict in particular and the conflict context in general and the problem in particular, interventional designs to suit the contextual needs as well as and mode of delivery, resource allocation to the conflict and peacebuilding program activities, identification of the right target groups for activities, human resource capacities to address the various conflict dynamics, coordination and synergy building for delivery and sustainability of the interventions. The other gaps identified were limited capacities both in financial and human resourcing, sustainability strategies and inefficiencies in the kind of tools and approaches employed to address the different conflict contexts/issues. The analysis concludes that when the resourcing of the peacebuilding interventions is improved in both economic and human resources, a greater reduction of violence and conflict, as well as community transformation, will be realized in both refugee settlements and host communities. It also gives practical recommendations to the government, UNHCR, humanitarian organizations, local leaders and communitymembers. The recommendations given by this analysis emphasize making it practically possible to effectively address the conflict context using the locally generated and locally mobilized resources and means to a greater extent. Click to Read the Full Report
Rwenzori Region Conflict Analysis Report
The conflict mapping for the Rwenzori region in 2020 was a prelude to the launch of the Networks for Peace Project that heralded the prevention and resolution of conflicts through early warning mechanisms in Africa, focusing on the Basongora and Batuku Minority Communities in Rwenzori Sub-region of Uganda. So, three years in a row (2020, 2021 and 2022), KRC Uganda in partnership with Minority Rights Group International, with financial support from UKAID has been conducting annual situational reviews of conflicts in region with particular interest in Kasese District where the minority Basongora pastoral community co-exists alongside other larger ethnic groups, mainly the Bakonzo who are predominantlycrop farmers. From the past to present, the two ethnic groups have coexisted with interethnic conflicts over resources, governance issues and cultural differences. The Networks for Peace Project which builds on prior conflict prevention and peace building initiatives by KRC and stakeholders in the region is now focusing of building and strengthening conflict early warning mechanisms to pacify a region that is historically prone to conflicts. The review of the conflict situation of 2021 was conducted among the Basongora pastoral community, in the Sub Counties of Nyakatonzi, Katwe Kabatooro, Lake Katwe, Muhokya, Karusandara and Hima Town Council, Kasese District. The objectives of the mapping were to identify the conflict triggers in the area and their respective indicators, the existing early warning mechanisms and the challenges encountered in addressing the conflictcontexts. Following the 2021 review, interventions were undertaken by KRC Uganda working with and through selected community volunteers, known as Peace Ambassadors. As part of the monitoring and evaluationin implementation of the project, KRC thought it imperative to conduct a review of the conflict context. The nature of the review and the compilation of this report is informed by the conflict issues that were identified in the first conflict mapping namely: UWA Community issues, Inter-ethnic issues, Intraethnic issues, domestic/interpersonal conflicts, land and political issues. It also gives recommendations for the respective stakeholders. Click to read the Full report
Mending fences of Rwenzururu kingdom with government
The return of His Majesty Charles Mumbere Iremangoma, The King of the Obusinga Bwa Rwenzururu (OBR) Cultural Institution, marks the beginning of a new chapter in the history of the Bakonzo people, and more specifically, the Rwenzururu Kingdom’s relationship with the government in power, as well as with other cultural Institutions both within and outside the country. This ear of improved relations also extends to other ethnic groups, academic institutions, security agencies, and Civil society groups, all of which can play a role in facilitating reconciliation between the OBR and the government. The process of mending these facets necessitates a comprehensive overhaul in the perception and pursuit of various structural components within the OBR cultural institution. This includes a reevaluation of the top administration, the central and community-based structures, and the entire body of subjects within the institution. This new era of improved relations calls for a more constructive and people-centric transformation. In other words, there is a need to shift from radicalism to reformism in terms of ideology. It is crucial to recognize that there has been a history of violence, stretching from the early days of the Rwenzururu Movement to the tragic events of the November 2016 raid on the Rwenzururu palace. This raid resulted in the loss of over 100 lives, the destruction of the palace, and the extended imprisonment of the Omusinga for more than six years until his return on October 4th. To mend these fractured relationships, it is essential to dedicate significant efforts to fostering interethnic unity, conducting well-guided intercultural dialogues, and engaging in discussions with cultural and interethnic groups, security agencies, and local and central governments. It is crucial to acknowledge the pressing need to transition from the errors of the past, particularly during the initial stages of the Rwenzururu Kingdom establishment, towards a fresh approach that prioritizes dialogue, reconciliation, interethnic harmony, and the implementation of Victim-Responsive Transitional Justice (TJ). In 2009, Uganda achieved a significant milestone by passing the National Transitional Justice Policy (NTJP). This policy offers a glimmer of hope to the victims of both past and recent conflicts in their noble quest for justice. The NTJP comprehensively addresses the legal and institutional framework for investigations, prosecutions, and trials within the formal system, as well as the critical aspects of reparations and alternative justice approaches. These elements are categorized into five key areas: formal justice, traditional justice, nation-building, reconciliation, amnesty, and reparations. The ultimate objective of the NTJP is to pave the way for peace, stability, and enhanced social cohesion in Uganda. In order to achieve this, it is essential that the OBR institution and the government collaboratively embrace and implement this approach while mending broken relationships The land question remains of paramount significance in the evolving era of new relationships and within the historical context of the OBR institution. It is crucial to acknowledge that in Kasese, the available land for settlement and cultivation is relatively small in comparison to the continuously growing population. A significant portion of the land is already occupied by water bodies, the imposing presence of the Rwenzori Mountains, national parks, game reserves, mining areas, and various other areas designated for government use, such as Uganda Railways, Uganda Prisons, the Salt Factory, Nyakatonzi cooperatives, and more. These factors have led to considerable tensions between cattle keepers and cultivators who are competing for arable land in the lower regions of Sub Counties like Kitswamba, Nyakatonze, Nyakiyumbu, and Hima Town Council, particularly along the boundaries of Queen Elizabeth National Park. It is imperative for the central government to take a proactive role in addressing this critical area of concern and provide a lasting solution that accommodates the interests of both groups, thereby promoting peaceful coexistence. The negative perceptions and attitudes surrounding the land issue have, unfortunately, been the primary reasons for Kasese missing out on opportunities, such as the subdivision of the district into smaller administrative units or districts, which could have brought substantial benefits to the local population. he negative perceptions and attitudes surrounding the land issue have, unfortunately, been the primary reasons for Kasese missing out on opportunities, such as the subdivision of the district into smaller administrative units or districts, which could have brought substantial benefits to the local population. To effectively manage the geo-cultural and political space and foster reconciliation between Rwenzururu and the current government, it is essential to implement a practical intervention strategy that addresses issues related to competition for geo-cultural and geo-political influence among the various ethnicities in Kasese and the broader Rwenzori region. While the Bakonzo hold a dominant and comparatively enlightened position in Kasese, this should not serve as a justification for suppressing other ethnic groups politically and culturally. Instead, it should be viewed as an opportunity to break free from the historical mindset of colonial subjugation. Cultural institutions do not have predefined boundaries; they revolve around how multiple cultural entities can coexist harmoniously in the same geographic area. Therefore, I urge His Majesty, the King of the OBR, Cabinet Ministers, politicians, and academics, both within and outside the institution, to reconsider their approach and promote interethnic harmony and peaceful coexistence. Similar to other cultural institutions and ethnic groups in Uganda operating within a legal framework, the OBR should initiate a comprehensive review of its legal framework. This review aims to align the institution’s policies with the country’s laws and ensure that they are generally acceptable to the governing bodies within the institution and the wider population. This process also involves engaging with individuals and groups who may have once opposed the institution’s recognition. The goal is to conduct this review in a spirit of transparency and openness, dispelling any misconceptions about secrecy that may have arisen in the past. This will help to build trust and foster a more inclusive and harmonious environment for all stakeholders involved. A well guided reconciliation process deeply rooted within the OBR, is of paramount importance at this juncture. This process can be facilitated by a group of highly respected individuals, an interfaith committee, or individuals both from within and outside the confines of the OBR who are universally trusted. In this regard, it is crucial to emphasize the importance of implementing the recommendations outlined in the 2005 Kajura Commission report. This report called upon the government to establish a truth and reconciliation commission, among other measures. If both parties, the OBR and the government, can embrace and collaborate on this process, it is my belief that both entities can find common ground and move forward together. Throughout this reconciliation process, Civil Society Organizations and Development Partners will adopt a non-confrontational approach to secure the necessary support from both State and non-State actors. Furthermore, these partners will invest in mobilizing and empowering communities with the goal of fostering a transparent, pro-people, legitimate, and sustainable effort to mend the relationship between the two institutions. Lastly, these partners will establish and strengthen both vertical and horizontal collaborations with various stakeholders, including local and central governments, other cultural institutions, different groups, Faith-Based Organizations, and religious figures at both local and national levels. This collective effort aims to advocate not only for the interests of the two institutions but also for the welfare of the general population. BY Francis Happy Muhindo Peace Building Officer-KRC UGANDA
RISING FROM HUMBLE BEGINNINGS TO A THRIVING BEEKEEPER
old packaging by the group before training by KRC-Uganda Upon completing my final exams, I fell ill unexpectedly. Despite the initial support from friends, some, including my closest companions, lost hope in my recovery and took possession of my belongings, anticipating the worst. Unable to afford medical treatment in Kampala, I was eventually taken to my home village. The illness was attributed to spiritual causes, and the ordeal persisted for six months. Eventually, I was healed, and a church member intervened on my behalf, securing a job for me in a nearby school. Starting my career as a teacher in 2015, I encountered the challenge of not possessing suitable clothing for the role. Despite earning a meagre monthly salary of 100,000 Ugandan Shillings, I had no choice but to accept the position. Through hard work and dedication, I garnered recognition from a sister school, which not only offered me a job but also tripled my salary. I diligently served there for three years until the school encountered financial hardships, leading to optional salary payments. Upon requesting my rightful pay, I was promptly replaced. Local beehives that the group owns for their Apiary project Taking the matter to the labour office, I eventually received my dues in instalments. Three months later, another school offered me a job, albeit far from my home village. The director appreciated my work and appointed me as the deputy head teacher. However, salary payments were irregular, with the director justifying the delay by emphasizing that we should prioritize service due to our position in the system. The year 2020 brought the unexpected challenge of the COVID-19 pandemic, forcing the immediate closure of the school. Financially strained and with no means of transportation for teachers, I returned home with nothing. Exploring various income-generating opportunities, I learned about beekeeping from a resident who made local hives. Starting a group and focusing on apiary, we registered and had our first successful harvest in 2021. The new and modern packaging that the group adopted after the training from the KRC-Uganda Staff. The turning point came when Ms. Alice from KRC-Uganda visited our village. After registering us, youth champions were called for training, emphasizing value addition and marketing. Our production capacity improved, and we began making beehives for sale, harvesting, processing, and packaging honey in a more efficient manner. Even the district showed interest in supporting our activities. Some of the Beehives sold by the group to earn extra income Currently, we sell beehives for 20,000 Ugandan Shillings each and honey in various sizes ranging from 2,000 to 400,000 Ugandan Shillings. In just two years, I have transitioned from being a teacher to becoming a successful beekeeper. I have acquired a motorcycle, land, a laptop, a printer, and expanded my network. KRC-Uganda challenged us to earn at least 3.5 million shillings annually, a goal that I believe I am achieving. I am no longer a job seeker; my journey has been from grass to grace. By Alice Kabajogya Project Assistant Krc-Uganda
NAVIGATING THE PATH TO JUSTICE: LAND-RELATED OFFENSES IN BIDIBIDI REFUGEE SETTLEMENT
Bidibidi settlement, located in Yumbe district, is the world’s second-largest refugee settlement and the largest in Africa. Covering an area of 250 square kilometers on the Eastern half of the district. According to UNCHR, it houses a total of 42,788 households with a population of 246,312, the majority of whom are refugees (246,310). This population comprises 84% women and children and 3% elderly individuals. The settlement has seen a continuous influx of refugees, driven by escalating political tensions and conflicts in neighboring countries such as the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and South Sudan. KRC-Uganda and their partners during a mobile court in zone 4, Palabek refugee settlement For many refugees from Sudan, South Sudan, Burundi, Ethiopia, and the DRC, Bidibidi settlement has become their new home. Refugees are allocated small pieces of land measuring 30mX30m by the Office of the Prime Minister (OPM), where they seek refuge and attempt to rebuild their lives. However, recent developments have posed challenges to the well-being of refugees in Bidibidi settlement. The World Food Program (WFP), which previously provided food rations to refugees, announced a reduction and potential discontinuation of this assistance due to funding shortfalls. As a result, refugees have been affected by acute malnutrition and starvation especially among children. Many have resorted to land for production while others have turned to activities such as casual laboring, brick making, and charcoal burning to survive. Unfortunately, this situation has also led to an increase in early marriages among young girls. In response to reduced food rations, refugees have sought to acquire more land from the host communities. However, this has presented its own set of challenges, including difficulties in accessing and utilizing the land. Many refugees have voiced concerns about the high costs charged by landlords and instances where landlords reclaim their land before the agreed-upon rental period expires, leading to conflicts. Access to justice for land-related issues has emerged as a critical issue, with many refugees facing obstacles in seeking legal redress. Several factors contribute to these limitations. Firstly, there is a lack of awareness among refugees regarding their land rights, the land tenure system and the legal processes available to them. Additionally, Uganda’s land laws do not explicitly recognize or adequately address the specific land rights of refugees, further complicating their ability to assert their rights. For instance, For instance, land in Yumbe District is communally owned but the existing land laws in Uganda do not explicitly recognize or adequately address the specific land rights of refugees. This limits refugees’ ability to rebuild their lives with dignity and resilience. Negative cultural norms and gender roles also play a part, as certain traditional practices discriminate against women. This is mainly because in male-controlled societies like in Yumbe, women don’t own easily access and own land, therefore making it challenging for them to seek justice. Furthermore, the geographical spread of the settlement poses a significant barrier to accessing legal aid services, as refugees living in remote areas may find it difficult to access these services due long distances and financial limitations to facilitate their travels to the legal aid service centres. To address these challenges, several recommendations have been proposed. These include launching targeted awareness campaigns using community leaders and information dissemination channels to educate refugees on their land-related rights and legal avenues. It is also suggested to establish a mechanism for integrating traditional land-use practices into the legal framework, ensuring cultural sensitivity and respect for refugees’ connections to the land. Regular workshops and information sessions on land-related laws and procedures are recommended to empower refugees with the knowledge needed to protect their land rights. Additionally, establishing legal aid clinics within the settlement or partnering with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to provide free legal assistance to refugees could improve access to justice. Strengthening Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) structures within the settlement is also proposed as a means of resolving conflicts. In conclusion, addressing the challenges faced by refugees in Bidibidi settlement requires a comprehensive approach that includes raising awareness of rights, addressing detrimental cultural practices, and establishing a more accessible judicial system. By empowering refugees with knowledge and providing them with the necessary support, it is possible to ensure that they can seek justice and defend their land rights within the settlement. By Francis Opio Peace Building Project Manager KRC-Uganda
Budget Tracking & Analysis for WASH in Lira & Kabarole Districts
Access to Water, Sanitation and Hygiene services are critical in ensuring people enjoy a good standard of living and that their rights are fulfilled. Despite the Government of Uganda (GoU) effort the WHO/UNICEF joint monitoring report 2021 reports that 20 million people in Uganda do not have access to a basic water source, 34 million people do not have access to basic sanitation services and 33 million people cannot practice good hygiene. The Kabarole Research Centre with funding from WaterAid undertook a budget and expenditure analysis study in Lira and Kabarole districts to get a better understanding of how these macro financial trends work out at district level. The study specifically sought to understand the financial flows, the district budget and expenditure on different rural water activities and analyze changes in the size of budgets for a period of FY2020/21 – 2022/23. The key findings from the survey indicated that the Government of Uganda continues to make investment into the sector although this funding has stagnated over the last many years. At a district level, the study findings show that local governments continue to grapple with reduced funding from the center which has affected their service delivery levels. This reduction has been met with a similar trend especially with the off-budget support from the Non-Governmental Organizations which have equally reduced theirfunding to the districts, in some instances beyond 40% in a given financial year. The Non-Governmental Organizations have committed most of their resources to Capital Expenditure (CAPEX) which account for an average of 60% of their investment in the districts followed by direct support and capital maintenance for the WASH infrastructure. The study also established that despite the funding and in some cases reduced funding, districts still grapple with full absorption of the released funds. This continues to undermine service delivery. For instance, at the National level, over UGX 208.12BN of the development donor was unspent over a period, a trend that had been on-going even in the previous years. It can therefore be argued that poor WASH service delivery in the districts is not largely explainable by inadequate funding but low absorption capacities in the districts, among others. This also explains why NGOs have now resorted to projectsupport to the districts The study also established that within the two districts under review, there has been a noticeable reduction in the locally generated revenues. This is because the establishment of new administrative units from these districts affected the most productive parts of the mother districts and hence, reduced local revenues, which has incapacitated the ability of these districts to effectively plan for WASH services. The analysis of funds transferred to these districts indicates that districts commit very little amounts to community-based engagements which are aimed at education, awareness creation and mobilizing community action towards WASH especially sanitation and hygiene. The study concluded that current WASH investment in Uganda is lower than what is required according to the target budget allocation and expenditure levels under the NDP III aimed at realizing the targets there under to grow and develop the human capital of the Country. The key limitation to this study was the inconsistencies of the data at the district and ministry levels. Relatedly, a lot of data that would have informed this study was not available and some which was, the custodians were not willing to share it toenrich this study. This was, however, harmonized using the data from the planning unit at the district level and expenditures from the Ministry of Water and Environment sector Performance Review Reports for the period 2020- 2023 as well as the Budget framework papers for the years under review Click to read full report
KRC-Uganda’s role in fostering unity and prosperity through Contract Farming
The maize garden after the application of the agricultural inputs from MYIB. In a remarkable effort to promote unity and collaboration, KRC-Uganda has played a crucial role in connecting youth from the Rwamwanja Refugee Settlement and the surrounding host community with contract farming opportunities. Through these efforts, these young individuals have been linked with landowners and provided with necessary resources such as seeds and agricultural inputs from MYIB. This article explores the pivotal role of KRC-Uganda in enabling refugee and host community youth to engage in maize farming, creating economic prospects, and fostering mutual cooperation. KRC-Uganda has acted as a bridge between the youth from the Rwamwanja Refugee Settlement and landowners in the host community. By facilitating the identification and negotiation of suitable land for contract farming, KRC-Uganda has laid the foundation for collaboration between the two groups. This partnership has not only provided access to fertile land but has also built relationships of trust and shared responsibility. The staff from MYIB training the youth in good Agronomic practices Recognizing the importance of providing essential resources for successful farming, KRC-Uganda has collaborated with MYIB to supply seeds and agricultural inputs to the participating youth. This support ensures that the youth have the necessary tools to cultivate their maize fields effectively. By connecting them with MYIB, KRC-Uganda has not only facilitated the acquisition of quality inputs but has also opened the door to future collaborations with agricultural suppliers. Through their collaboration with KRC-Uganda and access to land and resources, youth from the Rwamwanja Refugee Settlement and the host community have gained significant economic opportunities. Contract farming has allowed them to engage in market-oriented agriculture, improving their income prospects and entrepreneurial skills. The facilitation provided by KRC-Uganda has been instrumental in creating an enabling environment for these youth to thrive as agricultural entrepreneurs. The team from MYIB handing over the agricultural inputs to the youth group KRC-Uganda’s involvement in connecting youth to contract farming opportunities has also contributed to sustainable agriculture practices. By partnering with MYIB to provide high-quality seeds and agricultural inputs, the program emphasizes the importance of sustainable farming techniques. This approach not only ensures improved crop yields but also promotes environmental stewardship and long-term agricultural sustainability. In addition to connecting youth with landowners and resources, KRC-Uganda plays a crucial role in fostering networks and collaboration among the participating youth. Through training sessions, workshops, and community engagements, KRC-Uganda facilitates knowledge sharing and peer-to-peer learning. These activities encourage the exchange of ideas and experiences, strengthening the bonds between youth from the Rwamwanja Refugee Settlement and the host community. The team from MYIB demonstrating to farmers to use the products The team from MYIB demonstrating to farmers to use the products KRC-Uganda’s instrumental role in linking youth from the Rwamwanja Refugee Settlement and the host community to contract farming opportunities has created a platform for economic empowerment and cooperation. By connecting them to landowners and facilitating access to seeds and agricultural inputs through MYIB, KRC-Uganda has laid the groundwork for successful maize farming endeavours. Through their collaborative efforts, these young individuals are not only cultivating crops but also nurturing a spirit of unity, shared responsibility, and sustainable development.Top of Form Authored by Fred Enoc KaahwaProject Volunteer
World Refugee Day 2024: KRC-Uganda’s Commitment to Honoring Refugees in Bidi Bidi Settlement
A person is considered a refugee under the 1951 Refugee Convention if they have fled their place of origin due to well-founded fear of persecution based on their ethnicity, political beliefs, religion, or other characteristics. This definition also extends to individuals who have been displaced by man-made or natural disasters. World Refugee Day is observed on June 20th of each year as a way to honor the bravery and tenacity of the millions of refugees who have been forced to flee their homes because of war, persecution, or natural catastrophes. The theme “Hope Away from Home” is particularly relevant in 2024 as it highlights the resilience refugees demonstrate despite being far from their original homes. It underscores the importance of instilling hope in refugees, even when they are displaced from their home countries. Hope is a powerful force that fosters perseverance and drives constructive change. At KRC-Uganda, we firmly believe that through our protection interventions, we have and continue to make a significant difference in assisting refugees overcome the traumas of displacement and help them thrive in their new communities by fostering conditions in which their rights are respected and they feel appreciated, supported, and hopeful. In an effort to make this year’s World Refugee Day a success, KRC-Uganda has teamed up with the International Refugee Agency—the UNHCR, the Office of the Prime Minister (OPM) and other implementing partners in Bidi Bidi and Rhino Refugee Settlements like World Vision, Plan International, HEKS EPER, ADRA, International Rescue Committee and Windle International among others. To provide hope and resilience to those displaced from their homes, KRC-Uganda is dedicated to promoting the rights of refugees, especially in terms of access to and utilization of land. We have also created spaces to showcase their stories and struggles to promote understanding and empathy between the host communities and the refugees. By utilizing its advocacy platforms, KRC-Uganda will galvanize public support for refugees by working with the Office of the Prime Minister (OPM), implementing partners, and private citizens to act and provide the necessary resources and opportunities for refugees to live with dignity and hope. As June 20th draws near, KRC-Uganda implores the government and all implementing partners to show their support for refugees by listening to their stories, meeting their needs, and acknowledging their contributions to host communities. By working together, we can ensure that refugees, even in distant places, can find hope and the possibility of a better future. By Francis Opio Peacebuilding Manager, KRC-Uganda
Community Conversation Spark Community Nutrition Action
Community conversations, commonly referred to as CC, are a nonlinear process that facilitates open and free discussions among community members about issues affecting their daily lives, enabling them to devise local action plans and solutions. In Misenyi village, Kakabara sub-county, the issue of malnutrition and stunting emerged as a critical concern during one of the CC sessions facilitated by youth champions under the Young Africa Works program, Cohort 3, in Kyegegwa district. Identifying this issue, two youth champions from the Misenyi Group of Hope, a local VSLA, raised it with the nutrition focal persons at Kakabara Health Center III. This led to their selection for training as Nutrition Lead Mothers by the Kyegegwa Hospital Nutrition team. Along with the group chairperson, these three women received training in basic nutrition practices to educate community members and facilitate the formation of care groups with other women and men in the village. Demonstrating how to help a baby latch with one of the young mothers present On May 29, 2024, the youth champions organized a follow-up CC session on malnutrition, inviting the HC III nutrition team, VHTs, the village woman councillor, and district leaders, including the Kyegegwa Hospital Nutrition focal person and the District Probation officer. The session focused on nutrition for pregnant and lactating mothers and children under five years of age. Leaders educated the community on achieving a balanced diet with locally available food sources. The nutrition focal person and HC III conducted cooking demonstrations on preparing nutritious food at home, especially for children under five, to prevent stunting. They emphasized exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life and conducted breastfeeding demonstrations to encourage good practices. Community members were enthusiastic, actively asking questions and sharing ideas. The 51 attendees made several commitments: Invite and engage more men in future nutrition training sessions. Create care groups in the community to facilitate peer-to-peer learning and the adoption of good nutrition practices. Demonstrating how to prepare meat for an infant by scraping it into small pieces. Being the origin of the nutrition conversation in Misenyi village, community conversations provide an open space for accessing nutrition information and training, not only for this village but for many others in the Rwenzori region of Uganda. Despite the abundance of food produced annually, malnutrition and stunting remain prevalent issues. The CC approach is key because it fosters mindset change in individuals within their natural environment, triggering community action for the sustainability of targeted interventions. By: Edlyne Kakibogo Project Officer Young Africa Works-Markets for Youth Program
Kickstarting a New Project at Rhino Camp Refugee Settlement: A Journey of Collaboration
We delve into the intricacies of kickstarting a new project in a refugee settlement—Rhino Camp. Rhino Camp spans the two districts of Terego and Madi Okollo in the West Nile Region of Uganda. Spanning two districts Rhino camp is one of the largest refugee settlements in the region. With diverse cultural backgrounds and significant needs, it is essential to approach project implementation with sensitivity and a deep understanding of the local context. KRC-Uganda’s new project titled Sustainable Transition to Locally led Emergency and Protection Services (STEPS) – in Uganda aims to enable local and national actors to effectively provide sustainable, locally-led emergency protection response in Uganda. The project emphasizes capacity enhancement, response to GBV and Child Protection risks, and effective response to Mental Health and psychosocial support needs among new arrivals. Embarking on a new project at Rhino Camp refugee settlement is both an exciting and challenging endeavour. This settlement, home to thousands of resilient individuals, offers a unique landscape for impactful community work. As the project team leader, I’ve had the privilege to engage with various stakeholders, each contributing their invaluable perspectives and support. Here’s a glimpse into the process of navigating and kickstarting a new project in this dynamic environment. Engaging with Stakeholders and partner organizations My colleagues and I began our journey with a series of meetings with leaders including the Settlement Commandant, RWCs, district officials, Block leaders and other implementing partners whose insights are pivotal for successful project implementation. During one of our initial discussions, a community leader remarked: “We are eager to see initiatives that respond to real live challenges of our people, especially our women and children. Your project has the potential to make a real difference here.” remarked the RWC3 of Omugo 7. This sentiment underscored the importance of aligning our project goals with the community’s aspirations. KRC-Uganda staff during consultations with OPM and partner organizations Partnering with other with other implementing partners like the Danish Refugee Council (DRC), Uganda Refugee and Disaster Management Council (URDMC), Save The Children International was crucial for leveraging existing networks and resources. During the meeting a representative from the Danish Refugee Council- the protection lead in Rhino Refugee Settlement, emphasized; “Our collaboration can amplify the impact of your project. By working together, we can ensure that no one falls through the cracks.” This collaboration fosters a more cohesive approach, ensuring that our efforts are well-coordinated and comprehensive. Discussions with UNHCR Understanding the lived experiences of refugees is essential. KRC-Uganda sought to understand this through the eyes of UNHCR. In a meeting with a UNHCR representative, one participant shared: “We have faced many challenges, but we remain hopeful. We need projects that not only address our immediate needs but also build our capacity for the future.” The resilience and optimism are a driving force behind KRC-Uganda’s project’s design and implementation. Overall, in kickstarting a new project in any location, there is need for continuous stakeholder engagement. This is because maintaining ongoing dialogue with stakeholders ensures that the project remains relevant and responsive to emerging needs. Regular meetings and updates help build trust and collaboration. KRC-Uganda STEPS Team Leader during consultations with other actors As we embark on this journey, it is clear that the success of our project hinges on the strength of our partnerships and the resilience of the community. By working hand in hand with stakeholders, we can create sustainable, impactful change. The road ahead is challenging, but with collaboration, dedication, and a deep commitment to the community, we are confident that our project will make a meaningful difference. By: Francis Opio Peace Building Manager/STEPS Team leader-KRC-Uganda
Gender Discrimination against Women and Girls
Gender discrimination occurs when one sex is favoured over the other, leading to disadvantages for the opposite gender. In our society, we frequently encounter such discriminatory situations between women/girls and men/boys. Globally, it is estimated that 736 million women—nearly one in three—have experienced physical and/or sexual violence by an intimate partner or non-partner at least once in their lives, with 30% of women aged 15 and older affected (UN Women, 2023). In the same report, most violence against women is perpetrated by current and or former or intimate partners. More than 640 million or 26 % of women aged 15 years and older have been subjected to intimate partner violence. Of those who have been in a relationship, almost one in four adolescent girls aged 15-19 years (24%) have experienced physical and or sexual violence from an intimate partner or husband. While 16% of young women aged 15-24 years have experienced this violence in the past 12 months. It’s important to note that, 56% of married women aged 15-49 years reported suffering physical and sexual violence by a husband (UBOS, 2021). Saddening to note is that, our communities have held in high esteem some traditional beliefs and practices that seem to discriminate against a girl child. Unconsciously or consciously families, workplaces, leaderships, communities, and societies have promoted discrimination tendencies in the name of protecting, disciplining, nurturing, and preserving the dignity of a woman or girl-child. There are still many cases of battering, sexual harassment & exploitation/trade, defilement, rape and teenager pregnancies, early marriages, denial of provision & basic needs of life, denial of expression, limited or no control and power over family resources, limited decision- making and manipulation, micro representation, denial on succession opportunities and assaults/insults. Women/girls have been left homeless, with many ending up in refugee camps, broken marriage relationships and sometimes with disability. The rate of depression, anxiety disorders, unplanned pregnancies, Sexually Transmitted Infections(STIs), and HIV is high in women who have experienced violence compared to those who haven’t. Most of the affected women/girls have never recovered from such a brutal, cruel, unkind, self-seeking vindictive, and arrogant mentality. They have suffered everlasting effects like; traumas, grief, hatred, revenge, isolation, sadness, suicide attempts, bed wetting, and sleeping disorders, Despite the numerous interventions and investment of resources by activists in advocacy work to highlight the status of women/girls. Gender-Based Violence(GBV) 42% are women and 41% men and on average 42 gender-based violence rank as the top women’s -rights issue that Ugandans want Government and Society to address (Afrobarometer Dispatch n. 792, April, 2024). In the four Sub Counties of Kabonero & Rwimi (Bunyangabu District) and Kasenda & Harugongo (Kabarole District) respectively, the situation is no different! During the Men- Engage training of 40 model men about ‘Gender Equality in Decision Making among Women and Girls, in June 2024 organized & funded by KRC- Uganda and facilitated by Rwenzori Women’s Forum (RWOF), domestic violence was ranked the highest community issues that needs attention. School dropouts & low levels of education, high consumption of alcohol, non-joint money savings, and imbalances in handling domestic chores among men and women spouses. Among the actions, awareness of the communities was considered important across the two Districts to raise awareness within the communities of farmers as championed by the Model Men under the Men-Engage Approach taking the lead in influencing mindset change among men in their communities. We have all, at some point, contributed to acts of discrimination against women and girls, whether in the workplace (such as in leadership or management roles and among peers), at home, in schools, marriages, businesses, or religious institutions. Therefore, it is crucial to reflect on the impact of the pain we have caused, whether intentionally or unintentionally, through our actions and attitudes. It is our collective responsibility to stand up for gender justice! By: Murungi Jackline MpakaGender Focal Person KRC-Uganda & Coordinator RWOF
THE BENEFITS OF MINDFULNESS MEDITATION
In today’s fast-paced world, stress and anxiety have become common challenges for many. Amidst the chaos, mindfulness meditation has emerged as a powerful tool for promoting mental well-being and enhancing the quality of life Caregivers practicing mindfulness meditation during a training session Mindfulness meditation is a practice that involves focusing on the present moment without judgment. It encourages individuals to observe their thoughts, feelings, and sensations as they arise, fostering a greater awareness of the present. Unlike other forms of meditation that may focus on specific goals or outcomes, mindfulness is about being fully engaged in the here and now. Starting a mindfulness meditation practice is simple. Begin by setting aside a few minutes each day to sit quietly and focus on your breath. Pay attention to the sensations of breathing, and when your mind wanders, gently bring your focus back to your breath. As you become more comfortable with the practice, you can gradually increase the duration of your sessions. some of the benefits of mindfulness meditation include: Mental Health Benefits One of the most significant benefits of mindfulness meditation is its impact on mental health. Regular practice has been shown to reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression. By becoming more aware of their thoughts and emotions, individuals can learn to manage them more effectively, preventing negative patterns from taking hold. Additionally, mindfulness meditation has been found to increase feelings of calmness and relaxation, making it an excellent tool for stress management. Physical Health Benefits: The benefits of mindfulness are not limited to mental health. Research indicates that mindfulness meditation can also have positive effects on physical health. For example, it has been associated with lower blood pressure, improved sleep quality, and enhanced immune function. By reducing stress, mindfulness meditation can help mitigate the harmful effects of chronic stress on the body, promoting overall well-being. Improved Focus and Concentration: In an age of constant distractions, maintaining focus can be challenging. Mindfulness meditation trains the mind to concentrate on the present moment, which can enhance focus and cognitive function. Studies have shown that individuals who practice mindfulness regularly experience improvements in attention span and memory. This makes mindfulness meditation a valuable practice for anyone looking to improve their productivity and cognitive abilities. In conclusion, mindfulness meditation offers a wealth of benefits for both mental and physical health. By cultivating greater awareness of the present moment, individuals can reduce stress, improve their focus, and enhance their overall quality of life. Whether you’re new to meditation or an experienced practitioner, incorporating mindfulness into your daily routine can be a transformative experience. By Keneema Trashillah EASE Officer-Rhino Refugee settlement
CHILDREN AND CONFLICT: RESILIENCE AND PEACEBUILDING AT RHINO REFUGEE SETTLEMENT CAMP
As the Monitoring and Evaluation Officer at the Rhino Refugee Settlement Camp in Uganda’s West Nile region, I have witnessed the profound impact conflict has on children. Nestled within the Terego and Madi-Okolo districts, Rhino Camp serves as a refuge for families escaping violence and instability. In these challenging environments, addressing the effects of war on children and actively involving them in peacebuilding efforts is not just important, it’s imperative. Humanitarian actors empowering adolescents during an EASE session Children in conflict zones often emerge as the most vulnerable population, facing immense trauma, loss, and displacement. The scars from these experiences can have lasting psychological effects. However, with the right support, children’s potential for resilience and recovery can be astonishing. Engaging them in constructive activities is a critical step toward mitigating the impacts of war and helping them reclaim a sense of normalcy in their lives. Programs that invite children to engage in conversations about peace and conflict resolution can be transformational. By creating platforms for them to share their experiences and emotions, we empower these young voices to become agents of change within their communities. Educational initiatives, creative expression through art, and recreational activities not only aid in their emotional and psychological healing but also equip them with essential skills for navigating their futures. Moreover, listening to children’s voices within the refugee camp provides invaluable insights. Their perspectives are crucial in informing policymakers about the challenges they face. These are vital for designing effective interventions that bolster their well-being and ease community integration. Recognizing children’s experiences is essential not only for understanding their difficulties but also for creating inclusive, impactful support systems. In conclusion, while it is heartbreaking to acknowledge the presence of children in conflict situations, their involvement in peacebuilding initiatives can be deeply transformative. At Rhino Refugee Settlement Camp, we are committed to empowering children through programs that foster healing and learning opportunities. By prioritizing their growth and resilience, we allow their narratives to evolve from those of victims of war to champions of peace, laying the groundwork for stronger communities and brighter futures. By Hillary Bwesigwa Monitoring and Evaluation Officer KRC-Uganda